Patellofemoral Pain & Orthotics, Predicting Who Will Benefit

Contents


Note: This article originally appeared on my physical therapy blog between 2014 and 2017. The clinical research, literature reviews, and self-experimentation documented here served as the raw foundation for SpineFITyoga. While the data and biomechanics discussed remain rock-solid, my application has evolved. Today, I have distilled this clinical science into SFY—a highly efficient, 5-minute daily system for a pain-free spine and total-body fitness.

A clinical prediction rule for identifying patients with patellofemoral pain who are likely to benefit from foot orthoses: a preliminary determination. (2010)

Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To develop a clinical prediction rule to identify patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP) who are more likely to benefit from foot orthoses.

DESIGN:
Posthoc analysis of one treatment arm of a randomised clinical trial.

SETTING:
Single-centre trial in a community setting in Brisbane, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS:
42 participants (mean age 27.9 years) with a clinical diagnosis of PFP (median duration 36 months).

INTERVENTIONS:
Foot orthoses fitted by a physiotherapist.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Five-point global improvement scale at 12-week follow-up, dichotomised with marked improvement equalling success.

RESULTS:
Potential predictor variables identified by univariate analyses were age, height, pain severity, anterior knee pain scale score, functional index questionnaire score, foot morphometry (arch height ratio, mid-foot width difference from non-weight bearing to weight bearing) and overall orthoses comfort. Parsimonious fitting of these variables to a model that explained success with orthoses identified the following: age (>25 years), height (<165 cm), worst pain visual analogue scale (<53.25 mm) and a difference in mid-foot width from non-weight bearing to weight bearing (>10.96 mm). The pretest success rate of 40% increased to 86% if the patient exhibited three of these variables (positive likelihood ratio 8.8; 95% CI 1.2 to 66.9).

CONCLUSION:
Post-hoc analysis identified age, height, pain severity and mid-foot morphometry as possible predictors of successful treatment of PFP with foot orthoses, thereby providing practitioners with information for prescribing foot orthoses in PFP and stimulating further research.

My comments:

This study was a follow up on an earlier study by the same authors that I also blogged. That study found foot orthotics with arch supports only had a modest beneficial effect in treating patellofemoral pain, with success (defined as those patients experiencing a marked improvement) in only 40% with the use of orthotics in those with patellofemoral pain.

What they did in this study was go back and look at the 40% who had success and see what factors they had in common, so that physical therapists can better predict who is likely to benefit from orthotic use.  They found four variables that increased the odds orthotics would help.

  1. being over 25 years old
  2. being shorter than 165 cm (shorter than 5’5”)
  3. worst pain less than 53.3 mm on a VAS (pain at worst less than 5.33 out of 10)
  4. midfoot width difference greater than 10.96 mm (a more mobile foot that flattens more when you put weight on it)

What they found was if the patient had 3 out of 4 of those variables, the chance of success more than doubled from 40% up to 86%.  2 out of 4 and you still had a 61% of success.

So the take home is that if you are over 25, not too tall (less than 5’5”), your pain isn’t too bad (less than ~5/10 at worst), and your foot flattens more than usual (probably you will need someone to measure that), there is a pretty good chance that orthotics with arch supports will help lessen patellofemoral pain.  With newer research showing patellofemoral pain is multifactorial, principally involving hip and thigh muscle weakness, orthotics should probably be considered only part of the solution in some people and study helps us decide who those people are.

From Clinical Theory to 5-Minute Practice One can read research all day (and I have) but it's still better to enact it. SpineFITyoga takes the best clinical and exercise science and translates it into direct, daily action. Master a neutral spine with Posture-5, then build lifelong, total-body conditioning with System-5. No BS, just dialed-in exercise.

  • The Time: 5 minutes a day.
  • The Cost: $49 a year.
  • The Guarantee: If your pain isn't decreasing and your fitness isn't improving in 40 days, I'll refund you in full.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Categories

Tags

Achilles tendinitis ACL anterior cruciate ligament Caloric Restriction CKC Diet eccentric exercise Electric Muscle Stimulation Electric Stimulation EMS EMS and pain Exercise Headaches intermittent claudication Intermittent Fasting lateral epicondylitis Low Back Pain McKenzie method neck pain neuropathy open kinetic chain patellar tendinitis peripheral artery disease peripheral vascular disease physical therapy plantar fasciitis PRE progressive resistance exercise spine strength stretch Stuart McGill supervised exercise Tendinitis Tendinopathy tendinosis tennis elbow TENS TKA TKR total knee total knee arthroplasty total knee replacement transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation treadmill training